🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a tussle between a defunct facility, government authorities and advocacy groups.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated debate over their fate often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in captivity, have been closely studied by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the federal government prevented the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near the famous falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the federal government funds the upkeep of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and social skills point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something Kristy Burgess discovered personally.

Burgess spent three years as a whale caretaker, a job that entailed building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the nuances and quirks in their dispositions. She developed a deep bond for two female belugas with contrasting personalities.

“Eve accepted me. The other demanded work,” she said. “They altered the way I perceive bonding.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the park attributes to age-related causes, but which activists say indicates the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The facility did not admit visitors to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Concrete is breaking off from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and navigate with fragments in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The park did not reply to a inquiry, but earlier stated: “The whales … receive far better health care and constant care than any human in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was terminated from the park in the spring following the death of Eos, an unwell beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the facility suspected details of the incident were disclosed to the news outlets and she was released not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s threat to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a individual beluga would require “immense personnel”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be taken immediately from the facility, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.

In recent months, the nation’s government official denied a request to export the whales to China.

“To approve the request would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals belong in the wild, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience authorize an relocation that would prolong the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements indicate a broader incorrect perception of the facts of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As officials struggle to find a solution, ideas have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.

A suggested refuge in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received official endorsement, has shown to be highly debated. The future facility, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a long term solution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ future.

Others say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a feasible approach in the near future.

Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the location will simulate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|