🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations worked, and shared recent overtures had been made by go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is treading a challenging course since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out stronger defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with the US president asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries exercised their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Status

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in some form if talks reopen.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the conference, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the 12-day war revealed the conflict could not be ended by military means. He stated the attacks began with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust challenging to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and stays the ultimate solution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and principles must be respected."

"Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained many lessons from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to break. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the government and the state in the aftermath of this attack."